Disagree with Google’s search results? You’ll be able to do something about it with a change the company plans to release starting Thursday.

Google’s SearchWiki is a feature that lets people elevate, delete, add, and annotate search results. Google remembers the changes a person made to search results, so repeat searches will show the same customizations and notes.

Google has been offering SearchWiki as an experimental feature to some people for months, but starting Thursday it will become available to anybody who’s searching while logged in with a Google account.

“This is a search feature that gets a user more control over their search results,” said Cedric Dupont, Google’s SearchWiki product manager.

SearchWiki shows an up arrow for promoting Web sites, an X for deleting them, and a 'note this' speech bubble for adding comments.

(Credit: Google)

There’s also a collaborative element: people can show the collective wisdom of the masses by clicking a “See all notes for this SearchWiki” link at the bottom of each search results page. That shows notes and how people have promoted or deleted pages in aggregate.

Google isn’t alone in its customization work. With a research project called U Rank, Microsoft has been testing the user-tuned search results idea. Mahalo presents search results created by humans. And Wikia Search, an open-source search engine, is open to user suggestions. “Today, search undervalues the human touch,” argues Wikia Search.

Feedback for ordinary search?
Where things get interesting is whether Google will use people’s voting behavior as an input to the regular search algorithm that determines the order of search results. Google already employs human judgment in its algorithm by virtue of its PageRank technique, which judges a Web site’s merit in part on how many other Web sites link to it, but people promoting or deleting specific Web addresses could be another signal.

Dupont was noncommittal about whether the company planned to build in that feedback loop, either directly as a signal to influence search rankings or indirectly as extra data that could help the company judge the relevance of its search results. But he certainly didn’t rule the idea out.

“We don’t close any doors. We constantly evaluate signals” that are incorporated into the search results algorithm. “Search is adapting to the Internet as it becomes a more participatory medium. Now you have people telling us specific things about how they’d like to see their search results.”

Certainly people’s collective behavior could be useful. For example, Dupont said, “You could imagine if we do see a particular site (about which) people have a unanimous opinion, that might trigger external things. Like maybe we should check out our spam control,” he said. In other words, if a lot of people deleted a particular page from search results, perhaps Google should check why its system isn’t flagging that page as a problem.

Another narrower possibility could be to use SearchWiki customizations to influence the personalized search results people can get through Google by signing up for the Web history feature. Dupont seemed cooler on this idea.

With SearchWiki, Google produces “customized search results in a very granular and precise manner,” adjusting only specific Web addresses and not broad influencers on search results. “At this point we don’t have anything to say about how to combine these two features.”

More: continued here

(Credit: AOL)

It’s been a busy two days for AOL Mail. On Wednesday, AOL launched a beefier version of the AOL Mail gadget for iGoogle. On Thursday, AOL won a few more fans with the introduction of its beta feature AOL Sync.

AOL Mail for iGoogle improves upon the previous gadget by replacing the preview-only capability with functionality that lets you compose, reply, and fully manage your in-box from the iGoogle page.

AOL Sync beta, launched today, targets mobile and desktop users with the ability to sync their AOL address book and calendar in real time to Microsoft Outlook, the iPhone, BlackBerry, phones running Windows Mobile, and phones made by Nokia, Motorola, and Samsung.

You’ll get started on AOL’s Sync site, where you’ll sign in to get access to the mobile or Outlook plug-in. On that end, AOL has turned to Funambol, which brings open-source push synchronization to companies like AOL.

It’s a little disappointing that AOL Sync beta won’t yet sync e-mail, but we’re always big fans of two-way syncing and if this beta catches on, message-syncing would be the next logical step.

More: continued here

MapQuest today got a few useful additions: You can now save personal data in your My MapQuest account — like your home and work addresses, your mobile numbers, and car’s mileage. The first two features make it easier to create a route involving one of your typical hangouts and send it off to a phone. The third helps you with your expense reports or taxes.

Other updates dropped on MapQuest users recently: You can drag a map around on-screen (finally), and grab and move a route if you want to change it (the “Highway 101 Always Sucks” feature). And there’s a robust “local” page that gives you a ton of information on events and news attached to a location. It’d be a good thing to scan before going on a trip.

MapQuest now lets you keep your favorite routes handy.

Since I’m sick of creating new accounts for every new service I try, I also like that you can log in to the new personalized MapQuest with my OpenID.

MapQuest continues to be relevant for a large number of users, and it also has deals with publishers who use its APIs. The cool QuickBooks data visulization service I covered recently, for example, use MapQuest data and maps.

However, I still won’t be using MapQuest. The service may be getting more capable, but the interface is busy and slow compared to Google Maps, which, by the way, saves the addresses you visit automatically.

Previously: MapQuest inches toward modernity.

More: continued here

Microsoft plans to offer one more public test version of Internet Explorer 8 before releasing the final version of the updated browser, the company said late Wednesday.

The next test, essentially a “release candidate” version will come in the first quarter of 2009. That means the final release won’t hit Microsoft’s initial goal of finishing the browser this year.

“Our next public release of IE (typically called a “release candidate”) indicates the end of the beta period,” general manager Dean Hachamovitch said in a blog posting. “We want the technical community of people and organizations interested in Web browsers to take this update as a strong signal that IE8 is effectively complete and done.”

Microsoft first demonstrated the browser at the Mix conference in March. Among its improvements are malware protection, better standards support, and the ability to carve off a piece of a Web page, known as a Web slice. It also supports having private sessions that don’t get logged in a browser’s history.

The first beta version was released in March, with a second beta arriving over the summer.

Hachamovitch said that Web site developers should test their sites and report “any critical issues” to Microsoft.

“We will be very selective about what changes we make between the next update and final release,” he wrote. “We will act on the most critical issues. We will be super clear about product changes we make between the update and the final release.”

Hachamovitch also called on technical users to download the current beta 2 version and let Microsoft know how that goes.

More: continued here

Several readers have e-mailed me and asked for instructions on how to take their HD YouTube videos and embed them elsewhere. As I mentioned before, this isn’t an officially sanctioned feature, and as such, the embed code you get on these video pages will still yield the lower-quality, non-widescreen clip.

Needless to say, this is completely unacceptable.

The good news is that you only need to make a few changes to the stock embed code get the job done. Here’s what to do:

Step 1: Copy this code and paste it to wherever you intend to embed the video:

Step 2: Grab the direct link to your video. In case you’ve never done this before, it can be found to the right of the video player on YouTube or from your browser’s address bar.

Step 3: Tweak the embed code. The finishing touch involves making a simple change to embed’s URL source code to direct it to the HD version. To do this, you simply need to copy the alphanumeric gobbledygook at the end of the link you grabbed in step 2 and paste it into the part between /v/ and the & symbol in the embed code.

That’s it–you’re done, and all you had to do was use copy and paste twice! The end result is this:

More: continued here

(Credit: Torch Mobile)

Here’s a fairly new, fairly stealth specimen for all you mobile browser buffs. The Iris Browser is a beta-only offering produced by Torch Mobile, a start-up that presented at last week’s Under the Radar conference.

While the beta for Windows Mobile phones 5+ is publicly available, consumers won’t likely be able to download it themselves in its full incarnation. The company will convert beta testers’ feedback into a more robust product to sell to manufacturers, who will brand the browser as their own.

I’ve been trying out the Iris Browser nonetheless–it’s got a full enough feature set to stand up to many of the third-party mobile browsers out there. Built on the open-source WebKit code, it’s got a lot of what we already see in Opera Mobile, Skyfire, and Mozilla’s mobile Firefox alpha, Fennec: search, various rendering views, zoom, bookmarking, a mouse, find in page, image capture, and tabs.

Iris Browser’s resolution is good, but page loading was on the slow side. Because its mostly void of branding, it looks a little plain, but beta testers may appreciate the singular way it bounces when you switch tabs and the way links bubbles like boiled water when you click. For those of you Windows Mobile owners intent on browser comparison, Iris Browser beta is worth an informational look.

More: continued here

What happens when your cloud provider has multiple datacenters and has the ability to move your code around based on their need (read: not your need)? One thing that any enterprise IT buyer knows how to say is “who’s throat do I choke?” When you have a composited application, who exactly are you going to be calling? The cloud providers have yet to address the myriad of problems which can, and will, arise.

read more

More: continued here